· 6/1/2001
United States v. Charles Lowell Kentz
Citations
- 251 F.3d 835
- 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4455
- 2001 Daily Journal DAR 5511
- 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 11372
- 2001 WL 585596
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting the idea that the large-number enhancement should only be applied to a telemarketing offense when the number of vulnerable victims was “larger than the average telemarketing fraud”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rymer, Hawkins, Gould
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.