United States v. Charles L. Wynn, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Due to the omission of a ‘design to conceal’ element, section 1957 prohibits a wider range of activity than money ‘laundering,’ as traditionally understood.”
• “abundant evidence” of structuring itself insufficient to demonstrate knowledge that structuring violated the law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).