United States v. Charles Jones, Movant-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that review of lawyer’s advocacy is deferential to the lawyer’s perspective at the time
• “There are significant advantages in having all the parties … 11 assert their claims in one forum, not only to avoid inconsistent factual findings, but also to 12 spare the litigants the additional costs of duplicate lawsuits.”
• counsel’s decisions are not to be evaluated in “hindsight”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).