United States v. Charles J. Hausmann and Scott P. Rise

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that defendant’s Rule 29 motion for judgment of acquittal “allege[d] that the government failed to ... prove ... [certain] elements of the mail and wire fraud offenses underlying the conspiracy charge”
• the lawyer who referred clients to a chiropractor buddy in return for kickbacks “deprived his clients of their right to know the truth about his compensation”
• the lawyer who referred clients to a chiroprac- tor buddy in return for kickbacks “deprived his clients of their right to know the truth about his compensation”
• noting the Guidelines' application notes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).