United States v. Charles Howard and Darren Green

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that court's preferred procedure and concluding the district court did not abuse its discretion in allowing the transcript where it reviewed portions of the tape against the transcript and properly instructed the jurors
• vacating sentence based on similar calculation when there was no evidence as to how many ounces a $20 rock of crack cocaine constituted
• reviewing the district court's decision to permit written transcripts as a listening aid for an abuse of discretion
• possibility of prejudice when transcript attributes statements to defendants who do not testify and there is no evidentiary basis for the attribution
• objections to government’s transcript of recorded statements involving defendant and informant appropriately resolved via a pretrial hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).