United States v. Charles Hedrick Stanley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a search warrant for a home includes that home’s curtilage
• defendant’s subjective feeling that he was in custody during questioning not controlling if evidence reveals that his freedom was unrestricted
• six or seven-space common area parking lot of mobile home park with no assigned spaces in which defendant’s automobile was parked not within curtilage of his mobile home
• “ ‘common area’ curtilage issue has been a thorny one for the courts”
• Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 8(a) requires a separate count 2 Similarly, in Ebeling v. Morgan, the defendant was convicted of six counts of opening mail bags after opening six mail bags in succession. 237 U.S. 625, 627–28 (1915

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).