· 5/6/1976
United States v. Charles Eldon Gould, United States of America v. Joseph Patrick Carey
Citations
- 536 F.2d 216
- 1 Fed. R. Serv. 233
- 35 A.L.R. Fed. 429
- 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 11475
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that adjudicative facts concern “who did what, where, when, how and with what motive or intent” (citation omitted)
- stating that adjudicative facts concern “who did what, where, when, how and with what motive or intent.”
- finding no.error when the district court took judicial notice that cocaine'is a controlled substance
- cases applying Fed. R. Evid. 201, upon which § 27-201 is based
- cocaine hydrochloride is a derivative of coca leaves
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gibson, Hea-Ney, Webster
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.