United States v. Charles Edward Compton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a threat made by law enforcement to obtain a search warrant if the suspect did not cooperate did not invalidate written consent to search
• where district court made no specific findings on voluntariness of consent, court of appeals reviewed record to determine whether denial of motion to suppress was clearly erroneous
• “Compton has no standing to contest the seizure of the drugs from the trash, having abandoned” it by “toss[ing]” it “into the trash”
• “Compton has no standing to contest the seizure of the drugs from the trash, having abandoned” it by “toss[ing]” it “into the trash”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).