United States v. Charles E. Webster and Bobby Nelson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[e]vidence of a differential between [a drug dealer’s] legitimate income and cash outflow is sufficient for a money‐ laundering conviction, even when the defendant claims income from additional sources”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).