United States v. Charles E. Rowe, Individually Rowe and Associates, a Professional Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• fact-finding that pertains to the rendition of legal advice qualifies as professional legal services
• explaining that “fact-finding which pertains 22 to legal advice counts as ‘professional legal services’”
• noting “[w]here the attorney was asked for business (as opposed to legal) counsel, no privilege attached,” but “fact-finding which pertains to legal advice counts as ‘professional legal services’” (citations omitted)
• “fact-finding which pertains to legal advice counts as 21 professional legal services”
• “Where the attorney [conducting an investigation] was asked for business (as opposed to legal) counsel, no privilege attached.”
• Upjohn “make[s] clear that fact-finding which 7 pertains to legal advice counts as ‘professional legal services’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).