United States v. Charles E. Larsen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning, in regard to two statutes whose relationship parallels the relationship between Sections 844(1) and 2332a(a)(3
• holding that § 841(a)(1) has extraterritorial application
• “Congress is empowered to attach extraterritorial effect to its penal statutes so long as the statute does not violate the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).