United States v. Charles Dunn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that res judicata and collateral estoppel do not bar a civil forfeiture action with respect to the same $28,500 for which a criminal forfeiture claim was unsuccessful
• res judicata and collateral estoppel do not bar civil forfeiture action for same currency for which criminal forfeiture claim was unsuccessful
• res judicata and collateral estoppel do not bar civil forfeiture action for same currency for which criminal forfeiture claim was unsuccessful

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).