United States v. Charles Cary Stokes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• although both of these cases related to situations where the defendant was entitled to access to the jury list, they noted that the standard of review for 28 U.S.C. § 1863(b)(7) was whether the decision to withhold the names was arbitrary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).