United States v. Charles Bret Swoape

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it was appropriate to enhance the defendant’s sentence under several different guidelines for his conduct in engaging in a shoot-out with police followed by his reckless driving during flight from a bank robbery
• no double counting where defendant, following bank robbery, shot at an officer, engaged the police in a high speed chase through a populated area, and instigated a shootout in a McDonald’s parking lot
• high-speed chase in which three officers shot and public endangered
• imposed bodily injury, official victim, and reckless endangerment enhancements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).