Skip to main content
· 10/9/2003

United States v. Charles Belk

Citations

  • 346 F.3d 305
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 20718
  • 2003 WL 22310364

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “If the district court’s refusal to depart rested on a ‘misapprehension’ of its legal authority, an appeal is proper, and we review the propriety of that legal determination de novo.” (other internal quotation marks omitted)
  • bifurcation of the element of prior conviction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McLaughlin, Cabranes, Parker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.