United States v. Charles Arthur Daughenbaugh

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to apply Watts when statements were made in a private letter and finding that the reaction of the recipient was probative to whether statements were a true threat
• “Guided by instructions . . . removing protected speech from the definition of ʻthreat,’ the jury is to determine the nature of the subject communication.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).