Skip to main content
· 10/26/2015

United States v. Charles Armour

Citations

  • 804 F.3d 859
  • 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 18663
  • 2015 WL 6457923

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • clarifying that the district court does not need to provide a defendant with treatment rules at sentenc- ing
  • holding similar condition rea‐ sonably related to rehabilitation and protecting the public
  • holding similar condition reasonably related to rehabilitation and protecting the public
  • allowing visits between 6:00 a.m. and 11:00 p.m. “at home or any other reasonable location”
  • allowing visits between 6:00 a.m. and 11:00 p.m. \at home or any other reasonable location\
  • declining to resolve whether the standard of review for the factors considered at a revocation hearing should be abuse of discretion or plain error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaum, Williams, Hamilton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.