United States v. Chaparro-Alcantara

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• all making factual finding that defendants did not establish prejudice from failure to inform them of right to contact consul
• “Application of the exclusionary rule is only appropriate when the Constitution or a statute requires it.”
• \Application of the exclusionary rule is only appropriate when the Constitution or a statute requires it.\
• “[Article 36] does not create a ‘fundamental’ right,” and therefore “the suppression remedy must be available, if at all, from the Vienna Convention itself.”
• “It is clear that Article 36 does not create a ‘fundamental’ right such as Sixth Amendment right to counsel, or the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination which originates from concepts of due process.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).