United States v. Chandia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the due process clause does not require the district court to find uncharged conduct by a heightened standard of proof before using it as a basis for determining a defendant’s sentence” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• applying the terrorism enhancement to a defendant convicted of a terrorism offense listed in 18 U.S.C. § 2332b(g)(5)
• district court “reasonably inferred by a preponderance of the evidence that [the defendant] intended to advance [LET’s terrorist] purpose”
• describing proceedings following remand for resentencing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).