United States v. Chalmer C. Hayes, Also Known as Chuck Hayes, Also Known as Charles Hayes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, under plain-error review, the defendant would not have been entitled to relief even if the court had found a violation of the Confrontation Clause because any error was harmless
• \assuming that the appropriate standard of review is the 'plain error' standard of Rule 52(b) . . . .\
• “assuming that the appropriate standard of review is the ‘plain error’ standard of Rule 52(b).... ”
• assuming that the plain-error standard was appropriate in reviewing a Confrontation Clause challenge presented for the first time on appeal
• assuming that the plain-error standard was appropriate in reviewing a Confrontation Clause challenge presented for the first time on appeal
• explaining that although the courts of appeals ordinarily do not entertain arguments that were not advanced in the district court, the rule is one of prudence rather than one of jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).