United States v. Challoner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant “ha[d] not demonstrated that his attorney was ineffective in failing to raise [an] issue on direct appeal” and, thus, that the defendant “ha[d] failed to show cause excusing the procedural default”
• applying Strickland to appellate counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).