United States v. Chad Camou

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an officer’s recklessness or deliberateness is a condition of exclusion only when, as in Herring, their acts were 37 attenuated from and not “directly” responsible for the constitutional violation
• extending Riley to the vehicle search context because of the particular concern for privacy intrusion
• placing the burden on the government to prove it acted in good faith
• a search roughly contemporaneous with an arrest that is limited to the area in the arrestee’s immediate control is lawful
• “Under the vehicle exception, officers may search a vehicle and any 5 24-904 containers found therein without a warrant, so long as they have probable cause.”
• “volatile nature of call logs” is not exigent circumstance; Riley “forecloses” that argument

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).