United States v. Ceverilo Chambers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that in order to refute the movant’s request for return of property, “[t]he government must do more than state, without documentary support, that it no longer possesses the property at issue”
• “The burden shifts to the government when the criminal proceedings have terminated. At that point, the person from whom the property was seized is presumed to have a right to its return, and the government must demonstrate that it has a legitimate reason to retain the property.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).