Skip to main content
· 6/8/1989

United States v. Certain Real Property & Premises Known as 1344 Ridge Road

Citations

  • 751 F. Supp. 1060
  • 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6852
  • 1989 WL 230926

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • denying appeal that argued a Magistrate Judge must issue a recommendation on motions to intervene
  • although the merits of intervenor’s substantive claim are a “dispositive” pretrial matter, the motion to intervene is not dispos-itive of a claim or defense within the meaning of Rule 72(a)
  • stay not appropriate in “a civil enforcement action brought by a federal regulatory agency entrusted with the protection of consumers, investors, or other broad segments of the population, whose welfare could be jeopardized by deferral of the action”
  • The Government has not shown how the motion to intervene is ‘dispositive of a claim or defense of a party,’ and consequently, has not shown that the Magistrate exceeded his authority under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Glasser

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.