United States v. Certain Real Property and Premises Known As

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court did not abuse its discretion in denying a withdrawal of Fifth Amendment privilege.
• holding that district court did not abuse its discretion in denying a withdrawal of Fifth Amendment privilege.
• holding that the district court acted well within its discretion when it entered a preclusion order, barring submission of evidence concerning matters that the defendant had previously shielded from discovery through his invocation of the Fifth Amendment
• explaining that a court's handling of \any motion precipitated by a litigant's assertion of the Fifth Amendment in a civil proceeding . . . necessarily depends on the precise facts and circumstances of each case\
• affirming order barring litigant’s ability to present material he previously claimed was. privileged because he attempted to withdraw his privilege only after faced with a motion for summary judgment
• affirming district court’s holding that defendant who invoked Fifth Amendment privilege throughout discovery could not withdraw privilege and respond to government’s motion for summary judgement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).