United States v. Cazares-Olivas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the agents’ failure to possess duplicate warrant required by the federal telephonic-warrant procedure did not violate the Fourth Amendment
• concluding that even though the violation of Rule 41 was “regrettable,” allowing the defendants to go free on that basis “would be a remedy wildly out of proportion to the wrong”
• a search conducted prior to the judge signing the warrant did not violate the Fourth Amendment because the officers had already received the judge's order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).