United States v. Cawley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• predicts that if Washington’s highest court were to confront this issue, the court would choose a more liberal “rebut-table presumption” theory
• “if a secured creditor could always recover against the guarantors, there would be no restraints on a repossessing secured creditor whenever there were guarantors”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• National Acceptance Co. of America v. Wechsler
  N.D. Illinois· 1980-05-05· cited 38×
• McGill v. Idaho Bank & Trust Co.
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1981-08-13· cited 24×
• United States v. H & S REALTY CO.
  D. Maine· 1986-11-17· cited 20×
• Liberty Bank v. Honolulu Providoring, Inc.
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1982-09-14· cited 19×
• Rotta v. Early Industrial Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1987-03-02· cited 14×
• McChord Credit Union v. Parrish
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1991-04-23· cited 13×
• United States v. Hunter
  D. Kansas· 1987-02-03· cited 13×
• Security State Bank v. Burk
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2000-03-24· cited 13×
• Leasing Service Corp. v. Appalachian Pocahontas Coal Co. (In Re Appalachian Pocahontas Coal Co.)
  S.D. West Virginia· 1983-03-28· cited 4×
• Empire South, Inc. v. Repp
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1988-06-28· cited 3×

Other cases named United States v. Cawley

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• United States v. Cawley
  E.D. Michigan· 1993-03-31· cited 2×
• United States v. Cawley
  Eleventh Circuit· 1994-12-16