Skip to main content
· 12/22/2014

United States v. Catrell

Citations

  • 774 F.3d 666
  • 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 24170
  • 2014 WL 7242835

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting the argument “the sentencing package doctrine only applies when a conviction has been vacated, as opposed to just a sentence”
  • applying per se plain error rule and remanding for correction of illegal sentence
  • applying per se plain error rule and remanding for correction of illegal sentence
  • applying sentencing package doctrine to vacated sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McHugh, McKay, Baldock

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.