· 10/28/2009
United States v. Castilleja
Citations
- 350 F. App'x 148
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that plaintiff’s breach of contract claim and defendant’s counter claims were state law claims not brought under title 11
- finding that plaintiff's breach of contract claim and defendant's counter claims were state law claims not brought under title 11
- finding that plaintiff's breach of contract claim and defendant's counter claims were state law claims not brought under title 11
- finding that plaintiff’s breach of contract claim and defendant’s counter claims were state law claims not brought under title 11
- finding that because the suit was originally filed in state court and the breach of contract claim and counterclaims asserted were based on state law, the suit could have pro- ceeded to the merits of the claims in state court.
- finding that because the suit was originally filed in state court and the breach of contract claim and counterclaims asserted were based on state law, the suit could have pro- ceeded to the merits of the claims in state court.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fletcher, Leavy, Rymer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.