Skip to main content
· 10/28/2009

United States v. Castilleja

Citations

  • 350 F. App'x 148

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that plaintiff’s breach of contract claim and defendant’s counter claims were state law claims not brought under title 11
  • finding that plaintiff's breach of contract claim and defendant's counter claims were state law claims not brought under title 11
  • finding that plaintiff's breach of contract claim and defendant's counter claims were state law claims not brought under title 11
  • finding that plaintiff’s breach of contract claim and defendant’s counter claims were state law claims not brought under title 11
  • finding that because the suit was originally filed in state court and the breach of contract claim and counterclaims asserted were based on state law, the suit could have pro- ceeded to the merits of the claims in state court.
  • finding that because the suit was originally filed in state court and the breach of contract claim and counterclaims asserted were based on state law, the suit could have pro- ceeded to the merits of the claims in state court.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fletcher, Leavy, Rymer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.