United States v. Castaneda-Marquez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “websites and their contents 27 may be proper subjects for judicial notice” where party “supplied the court with hard 1 notice”
• recognizing that “websites and their contents may be proper subjects 15 for judicial notice” where party “supplied the court with hard copies of the actual web pages of 16 which they sought to have the court take judicial notice”
• recognizing that 13 “websites and their contents may be proper subjects for judicial notice” where party “supplied the 14 court with hard copies of the actual web pages of which they sought to have the court take judicial 15 notice”
• recognizing that 22 “websites and their contents may be proper subjects for judicial notice” where party “supplied the 23 court with hard copies of the actual web pages of which they sought to have the court take judicial 24 notice”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).