Skip to main content
· 7/6/2023

United States v. Cash Otradovec

Citations

  • 72 F.4th 794

Oral argument

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that there was a dispute as to availability of remedies where officers told prisoner that he could not file a grievance
  • recognizing “the importance of ensuring that inmates have avenues for discovering the procedural rules governing their grievances”
  • holding that “substantial compliance” with administrative remedy procedures does not satisfy exhaustion requirements
  • holding that “substantial compliance” with administrative remedy procedures does not satisfy exhaustion
  • noting that prison officials “must establish beyond peradventure all of the essential elements of the defense of exhaustion”
  • holding “judges may resolve factual disputes concerning exhaustion” through an evidentiary hearing on material factual disputes if necessary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.