United States v. Cartier

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the “standard 6 Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(e)(2)(B) provides for a two-step process for the search and seizure of electronic storage media, as follows: Warrant Seeking Electronically Stored Information. A warrant under Rule 41(e)(2)(A
• affirming district court’s holding that a search warrant which relied in part on hash matching without a visual inspection of the files did not lack probable cause
• affirming the denial of defendant’s motion to suppress inter alia because law enforcement declared in warrant affidavit that defendant downloaded images from P2P network with identical hash values to images known to law enforcement to be visual depictions of minors engaged in sexual conduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).