Sixth Circuit· 4/3/2006

United States v. Carson Beasley

Citations

442 F.3d 386
2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 7999
2006 WL 845564

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

determining that “CA:M2” notation on state judgment of conviction meant “criminal attempt, second degree murder” based on “basic common sense” and as corroborated through non-Shepard evidence
reviewing a district court’s reasonable interpretation of “CA:M2” as criminal attempt, second degree murder
“[W]e have held that a district court does not violate the Sixth Amendment by determining the fact and nature of a defendant’s prior convictions and using these findings to impose an increased sentence under the Armed Career Criminal Act.”
“Rather, in making its determination, the district court expressly stated that it relied only on the state court judgment and underlying indictment, materials that are explicitly within the scope of the ‘categorical approach’ approved by the Supreme Court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rogers, Sutton, Rosen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.