Skip to main content
· 9/10/2012

United States v. Carrell Johnson

Citations

  • 694 F.3d 1192
  • 2012 WL 3890136

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • sug- gesting that plain-error review applies when a defendant makes only a blanket objection that his sentence is “procedurally unrea- sonable”
  • “In order for an error to be obvious for purposes of plain error review, it must be plain under controlling precedent or in view of the unequivocally clear words of a statute or rule.” (quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Higginbotham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.