United States v. Carolyn Sue Davis (06-5073) and Otis Davis (06-5074)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that an intent to defraud “can be inferred from efforts to conceal the unlawful activity” (citation omitted)
• noting that intent to defraud “can be inferred from efforts to conceal the un- lawful activity”
• explaining that circumstantial evidence of fraudulent intent can include profits
• referring to “the paradigm health care fraud case” as one “consisting of claims for pharmaceuticals or supplies in the obvious absence of medical need”
• permitting an inference of knowing participation from repeated fraudulent transactions occurring at defendant’s home
• “[T]he record contains testimony ... that implicates Mr. Davis in cover-up operations to destroy evidence, from which the jury could infer that he sought to conceal his own wrongful acts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).