United States v. Carole Diaz, AKA Carole M. Cefaratti, Carole Cefaratti-Diaz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• deciding that the Amendment cannot apply retroactively to a sentence imposed before November 1, 2000 because the Amendment represented a substantive change in the law
• stating a court “cannot order multiple defendants to pay restitution in amounts that will result in the payment to the victim of an amount greater than the victim’s loss”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).