Skip to main content
· 7/26/1991

United States v. Caro-Quintero

Citations

  • 769 F. Supp. 1564
  • 1991 WL 134914

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding juror’s individual voir dire statements to be more credible than his post-verdict declarations
  • “[T]he mere fact that local newspapers were in the jury room does not amount to extraneous influences on the jury ...; [the newspapers] cannot even be characterized as extrinsic evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rafeedie

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.