United States v. Carnell Brown, Cross-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that facts such as the defen- dant’s “movements in the car, his failure to produce a license, and his quick movement” justified “a limited patdown for weapons”
• noting that a “stop by a lone officer at night is even more dangerous”
• although actual injury not always present, risk of physical injury always involved in pandering by compul- sion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).