United States v. Carmen Santiago, Sharon Corbett, Charles Cloud

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “This court applies a liberal standard in determining whether a statement is made in furtherance of a conspiracy.”
• no new trial required based on a witness’s recantation that was later retracted
• “The search in the Atlanta airport occurred at the functional equivalent of the border. . . . Because secondary searches do not require any suspicion of illegal activities, the searches at the Atlanta airport were proper.”
• “[R]ecantations are viewed with extreme suspicion by the courts.”
• “[R]ecantations are viewed with extreme suspicion by the courts.”
• “[R]ecantations are viewed with extreme suspicion by the courts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).