United States v. Carmelo Bello-Bahena, United States of America v. Carmelo Bello-Bahena

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ordering a new trial when district court denied instruction on official restraint
• “It is well established in this circuit that official restraint includes constant governmental observation or surveillance from the moment of entry.”
• no official restraint when defendant first observed after he crossed the border
• reaching the same conclusion on similar facts
• reviewing for abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).