United States v. Carluin Sanchez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a new trial is appropriate only where the evidence before the jury, other the perjured testimony, “preponderate^] heavily against the verdict, such that it would be a miscarriage of justice to let the verdict stand”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).