United States v. Carlton Victor Smith Thomas Albert Nichols John Herbert Crisp

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding it relevant that each transaction in the single conspiracy “followed an identical modus operandi ”
• relying on testimony from two witnesses that the defendant prepared and armed himself for a home invasion while in Tennessee, then traveled to Georgia where he held -7- No. 18-6103, United States v. Bates hostages at gunpoint
• jury could infer that the defendants learned of “prior robberies and the continuing nature of the scheme” from their coconspirator, and therefore agreed to the conspiracy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).