United States v. Carlton Raymond Owens

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• testimony of two accomplices was only evidence that defendant possessed stolen money orders, error plain and prejudicial
• failure to give instruction was plain error when accomplice testimony was only evidence directly implicating defendant in crime
• conviction based on uncorroborated accomplice testimony without cautionary instruction was plain error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).