· 5/6/1996
United States v. Carlos Vasquez
Citations
- 82 F.3d 574
- 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 10452
- 1996 WL 224026
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming a conviction where the omitted jury instructions, although legally correct and even “preferable,” were not necessary
- “A criminal 27 defendant is entitled to a jury charge that reflects his defense.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kearse, Walker, Heaney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.