Skip to main content
· 5/6/1996

United States v. Carlos Vasquez

Citations

  • 82 F.3d 574
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 10452
  • 1996 WL 224026

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming a conviction where the omitted jury instructions, although legally correct and even “preferable,” were not necessary
  • “A criminal 27 defendant is entitled to a jury charge that reflects his defense.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kearse, Walker, Heaney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.