United States v. Carlos Saunders

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that we are \bound by the credibility choices of the jury\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
• stating that witness credibility is not reviewed in a sufficiency of the evidence challenge
• generally, witness credibility is within the sole province of the fact finder, and this court will not reassess the credibility of testimony
• credibility of witnesses is within sole province of fact-finder and not susceptible to review on appeal
• standard of review for adjustment under § 3C1.1
• applying this standard to credibility determination by jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).