Skip to main content
· 6/8/1983

United States v. Carlos Rodriguez Cruz

Citations

  • 709 F.2d 111
  • 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 26925

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • involving dismissal of a felony charge pursuant to Rule 11(e)(1)(A) in return for defendant pleading guilty to a misdemeanor charge
  • reversing district court’s vacatur of plea because mandated sentence in plea agreement was inconsistent with sentences received by co-defendants
  • rejecting requirement of \imposition of sentence and formal pronouncement or entry of judgment\
  • “We agree that jeopardy must attach somewhere and bar reconsideration at some point, but acceptance of the plea is not the only possible point.”
  • double jeopardy violated where, after accepting defendant’s guilty plea, trial court subsequently rejected plea based solely on information in pre-sentence report
  • double jeopardy violated where, after accepting defendant's guilty plea, trial court subsequently rejected plea based solely on information in pre-sentence report

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coffin, Campbell, Bownes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.