· 6/8/1983
United States v. Carlos Rodriguez Cruz
Citations
- 709 F.2d 111
- 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 26925
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- involving dismissal of a felony charge pursuant to Rule 11(e)(1)(A) in return for defendant pleading guilty to a misdemeanor charge
- reversing district court’s vacatur of plea because mandated sentence in plea agreement was inconsistent with sentences received by co-defendants
- rejecting requirement of \imposition of sentence and formal pronouncement or entry of judgment\
- “We agree that jeopardy must attach somewhere and bar reconsideration at some point, but acceptance of the plea is not the only possible point.”
- double jeopardy violated where, after accepting defendant’s guilty plea, trial court subsequently rejected plea based solely on information in pre-sentence report
- double jeopardy violated where, after accepting defendant's guilty plea, trial court subsequently rejected plea based solely on information in pre-sentence report
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Coffin, Campbell, Bownes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.