Skip to main content
· 9/18/1992

United States v. Carlos Rodriguez

Citations

  • 975 F.2d 404
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 22421
  • 1992 WL 228880

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “In isolation,. any one of the facts described in the Government proffers might conceivably be dismissed as mere coincidence. Considering the proposed evidence in total, it more than represents the sort of suspicious circumstances that convince us.... ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cummings, Coffey, Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.