United States v. Carlos Montenegro-Recinos

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the age of majority is \eighteen years of age in most states\
• applying the ordinary meaning to the term “sexual abuse of a minor” because the term was not defined in the sentencing guidelines
• ten-year age difference and young age of the victim establishes abusive nature of conduct where statute covers consensual and non-consensual contact
• “We might well question whether the [sexual contact] described [by the statute] would amount to sexual abuse were it engaged in by someone of a similar age.”
• ten-year age difference and young age of the victim establishes abusive nature of conduct where statute covers consensual and non-consensual contact
• “We might well question whether the [sexual contact] described [by the statute] would amount to sexual abuse were it engaged in by someone of a similar age.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).