United States v. Carlos Joly

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• conscious purpose to avoid enlightenment when he \had every reason to believe\ he possessed a controlled substance
• conscious purpose to avoid enlightenment when he “had every reason to believe” he possessed a controlled substance
• charge required finding “that the defendant believed that he had cocaine and deliberately and consciously tried to avoid learning [it]” or “[in] other words, that he deliberately closed his eyes to what he had every reason to believe was the fact.”
• 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 952(a), 955, 960(a)(1) & (2); United States v. Thomas, 484 F.2d 909, 912-13 (6th Cir. 1973) (18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(6): firearms); United States v. Jacobs, 475 F.2d 270, 287-88 (2d Cir. 1973) (conspiracy to violate 18 U.S.C. §§ 2314 & 2315: stolen securities
• 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 952(a), 955, 960(a)(1) & (2); United States v. Thomas, 484 F.2d 909, 912-13 (6th Cir. 1973) (18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(6): firearms); United States v. Jacobs, 475 F.2d 270, 287-88 (2d Cir. 1973) (conspiracy to violate 18 U.S.C. §§ 2314 & 2315: stolen securities

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).