United States v. Carlos Hernandes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• limiting decision to \only analyz[ing] this particular Rule 60(b) motion\ under Gonzalez
• applying Gonzalez to analyze a Rule 60(b) motion filed in a § 2255 proceeding
• “[W]here a Rule 60(b) motion advances one or more substantive claims, as opposed to a merely procedural claim, the motion should be construed as a successive § 2255 motion.” (citations omitted)
• “[W]here a Rule 60(b) motion advances one or more substantive claims, as opposed to a merely procedural claim, the motion should be construed as a successive § 2255 motion.” (citations omitted)
• applying Gonzalez to analyze a Rule 60(b
• explaining the distinction between Rule 60(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).